Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 84394

On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 11:33:06PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote: > Am 15.03.19 um 21:31 schrieb Steve Kargl: > > Patch is missing? > > Entirely correct. Here it is. > Patch looks ok to me. -- Steve

Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 84394

Am 15.03.19 um 21:31 schrieb Steve Kargl: Patch is missing? Entirely correct. Here it is. Regards Thomas Index: symbol.c === --- symbol.c (Revision 269635) +++ symbol.c (Arbeitskopie) @@ -1689,7 +1689,15 @@ gfc_add_subro

Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 84394

On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 07:55:51PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote: > Hello world, > > this patch fixes a rejects-valid 7/8/9 regression where subroutines like > _deallocate are added to a derived type in a block data, and because > they were marked PRIVATE, an error occurred. > > This solution is loo

[patch, fortran] Fix PR 84394

Hello world, this patch fixes a rejects-valid 7/8/9 regression where subroutines like _deallocate are added to a derived type in a block data, and because they were marked PRIVATE, an error occurred. This solution is look for this particular case by checking for an underscore as the first letter