Hi Thomas,
> Anything else? …
Yes, the tests gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90 and
gfortran.dg/no_arg_check_2.f90 fail:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times original
"sub_array_assumed (D" 3 (found 4 times)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90 -O scan-tree-dump
Am 08.03.19 um 08:04 schrieb Bernhard Reutner-Fischer:
Please change call abort to stop N in the test?
Done.
Anything else? OK for trunk?
Regards
Thomas
On 6 March 2019 19:49:59 CET, Thomas Koenig wrote:
>Hello world,
>
>the attached patch fixes a 7/8/9 regression where dependency checking
>was for class arrays and a scalar value was mishandled when the
>dependency happened in an elemental function.
>
>There was an ICE for the test case which is h
Hello world,
the attached patch fixes a 7/8/9 regression where dependency checking
was for class arrays and a scalar value was mishandled when the
dependency happened in an elemental function.
There was an ICE for the test case which is handled by
fixing up the class refs in gfc_walk_variable_ex
