Hi Steve,
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 04:08:54PM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote:
Regression-tested on trunk. OK for trunk and 4.6? What about 4.5?
OK for trunk and 4.6. If it applies cleanly to 4.5 and
passes regression testing, then you can also commit to
4.5 at your discretion.
Committed t
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 04:08:54PM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote:
>
> Regression-tested on trunk. OK for trunk and 4.6? What about 4.5?
>
> Thomas
>
> 2011-05-29 Thomas Koenig
>
> PR fortran/45786
> * interface.c (gfc_equivalent_op): New function.
> (gfc_check_i
Hello world,
the attached patch fixes PR 45786, where using == instead of .eq. in a
PUBLIC statement caused us to miss exporting the symbol. I introduced a
function for equivalencing INTRINSIC_EQ with INTRINSIC_EQ_OS (and
others), which I also used in another place to tidy up the code a bit.
Re