Hi Jerry,
On 05/01/2011 02:49 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
Hello world,
after Paul's fix for allocate on assignment (thanks Paul!), here is a
patch for the original test case from PR 22572, where the bounds of
the function are unknown at compile time. This uses an allocatable
temporary.
In the lo
On 05/01/2011 02:49 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
Hello world,
after Paul's fix for allocate on assignment (thanks Paul!), here is a
patch for the original test case from PR 22572, where the bounds of
the function are unknown at compile time. This uses an allocatable
temporary.
In the long run, anot
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:18:57PM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Am 03.05.2011 22:12, schrieb Thomas Koenig:
> >Am 01.05.2011 11:49, schrieb Thomas Koenig:
> >>Hello world,
> >>
> >>after Paul's fix for allocate on assignment (thanks Paul!), here is a
> >>patch for the original test case from PR 22
Am 03.05.2011 22:12, schrieb Thomas Koenig:
Am 01.05.2011 11:49, schrieb Thomas Koenig:
Hello world,
after Paul's fix for allocate on assignment (thanks Paul!), here is a
patch for the original test case from PR 22572, where the bounds of
the function are unknown at compile time. This uses an a
Am 01.05.2011 11:49, schrieb Thomas Koenig:
Hello world,
after Paul's fix for allocate on assignment (thanks Paul!), here is a
patch for the original test case from PR 22572, where the bounds of
the function are unknown at compile time. This uses an allocatable
temporary.
Ping?
Thomas
Hello world,
after Paul's fix for allocate on assignment (thanks Paul!), here is a
patch for the original test case from PR 22572, where the bounds of
the function are unknown at compile time. This uses an allocatable
temporary.
In the long run, another option is to use interface mapping to eva