Hi Thomas,
Am 20.03.23 um 08:14 schrieb Thomas Koenig via Gcc-patches:
so it the general problem is not restricted to -O3 and not
to current trunk, it depends on the details.
I doubt that the result from 9.4.0 was expected, but rather
nobody noticed. Or, bringing out the pseudo-RNG into a
diff
I wrote:
Yes, that's fine for trunk. I wonder if it is worth being explicit that
linear congruential pseudo-random number generators can and do fail at
-O3?
I don't think we should put this into the docs, because that can change
at any time. Maybe into porting_to.html, though (where I have
Hi Paul,
Yes, that's fine for trunk. I wonder if it is worth being explicit that
linear congruential pseudo-random number generators can and do fail at -O3?
I don't think we should put this into the docs, because that can change
at any time. Maybe into porting_to.html, though (where I have on
On Mär 19 2023, Thomas Koenig via Gcc-patches wrote:
> diff --git a/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi b/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi
> index c483e13686d..93c66b18938 100644
> --- a/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi
> +++ b/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi
> @@ -820,6 +820,7 @@ might in some way or another become visible to
Hi Thomas,
Yes, that's fine for trunk. I wonder if it is worth being explicit that
linear congruential pseudo-random number generators can and do fail at -O3?
Thanks for the doc patches!
Paul
On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 at 08:32, Thomas Koenig via Fortran
wrote:
> Here's also an update on the docs t
Here's also an update on the docs to explicitly mention behavior
on overflow.
Maybe this will reach another 0.05% of users...
OK for trunk?
Best regards
Thomas
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
* gfortran.texi: Mention behavior on overflow.
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi b/gcc/f
