Hi Harald,
It appears that something is not right and generates wrong code with
the check enabled. Can you have another look?
The problem was indeed that generating a formal from an actual
arglist is a bad idea when classes are involved. Fixed in the
attached patch. I think it still makes s
Hi Thomas,
Am 04.05.25 um 12:10 schrieb Thomas Koenig:
Hi Harald,
It appears that something is not right and generates wrong code with
the check enabled. Can you have another look?
The problem was indeed that generating a formal from an actual
arglist is a bad idea when classes are involved
Hi Harald,
It appears that something is not right and generates wrong code with
the check enabled. Can you have another look?
The problem was indeed that generating a formal from an actual
arglist is a bad idea when classes are involved. Fixed in the
attached patch. I think it still makes s
Hi Thomas,
I haven't tested your patch very thorougly, but when manually
compiling
% gfc-16 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_52.f90
-Wexternal-argument-mismatch && ./a.out
STOP 1
It appears that something is not right and generates wrong code with
the check enabled. Can you have another lo
Hello world,
This patch fixes a case where too much was being checked with
-Wexternal-arguments-mismatch with a procedure pointer with an
unlimited polymorphic and an INTEGER argument which was inferred from
an actual argument.I also found some checks which can trigger false
positives, which this
