On 03/21/2018 04:43 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 03/12/2018 01:14 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
this patch fixes an ICE in the parloops pass.
The ICE (when compiling the test-case in attached patch) follows f
On 03/21/2018 04:43 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 03/12/2018 01:14 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
this patch fixes an ICE in the parloops pass.
The ICE (when compiling the test-case in attached patch) follows f
On Wed, 21 Mar 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 03/12/2018 01:14 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Feb 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > this patch fixes an ICE in the parloops pass.
> > >
> > > The ICE (when compiling the test-case in attached patch) follows from the
> >
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 3:06 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 03/12/2018 01:14 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 22 Feb 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> this patch fixes an ICE in the parloops pass.
>>>
>>> The ICE (when compiling the test-case in attached patch) follows from the
>>>
On 03/12/2018 01:14 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
this patch fixes an ICE in the parloops pass.
The ICE (when compiling the test-case in attached patch) follows from the fact
that here in gen_parallel_loop the call to canonicalize_loop_ivs fails to
"ba
On Wed, 21 Mar 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 03/12/2018 01:14 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Feb 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > > I can
> > > rework the bit of the patch that adds an assert after
> > > canonicalize_loop_ivs
> > > into a patch that aborts the optimization instead of ICE-i
On 03/12/2018 01:14 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
I can
rework the bit of the patch that adds an assert after canonicalize_loop_ivs
into a patch that aborts the optimization instead of ICE-ing.
I think that's something reasonable anyway.
Patch attached b
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch fixes an ICE in the parloops pass.
>
> The ICE (when compiling the test-case in attached patch) follows from the fact
> that here in gen_parallel_loop the call to canonicalize_loop_ivs fails to
> "base all the induction variables in L
Hi,
this patch fixes an ICE in the parloops pass.
The ICE (when compiling the test-case in attached patch) follows from
the fact that here in gen_parallel_loop the call to
canonicalize_loop_ivs fails to "base all the induction variables in LOOP
on a single control one":
...
/* Base all the