On 06/26/13 10:33, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 09:44:03AM -0500, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
This is a followup for the C++ changes (your pt.c suggested changes, etc).
Only a few minor changes are needed, since c_finish_cilk_simd_loop()
is shared between C/C++ and it creates the appr
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 09:44:03AM -0500, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> This is a followup for the C++ changes (your pt.c suggested changes, etc).
>
> Only a few minor changes are needed, since c_finish_cilk_simd_loop()
> is shared between C/C++ and it creates the appropriate CILK_SIMD
> tree node.
>
>
This is a followup for the C++ changes (your pt.c suggested changes, etc).
Only a few minor changes are needed, since c_finish_cilk_simd_loop() is
shared between C/C++ and it creates the appropriate CILK_SIMD tree node.
Is this what you had in mind?
commit db2127098137dea6c246041e0d763a57a174f
case NE_EXPR:
- if (!flag_enable_cilk)
+ /* NE_EXPR is only allowed for Cilk Plus loops. */
+ if (flag_enable_cilk
Very weird name of a flag. Should have been flag_cilk or flag_cilkplus
IMHO.
I know. It was already there from Balaji's first iteration with a
> case NE_EXPR:
> - if (!flag_enable_cilk)
> + /* NE_EXPR is only allowed for Cilk Plus loops. */
> + if (flag_enable_cilk
> + && gimple_omp_for_kind (for_stmt) == GF_OMP_FOR_KIND_CILKSIMD)
> + break;
> + else
> gcc_unreachable ();
> -
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 07:16:56AM -0500, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> I have done as suggested, and cleaned things up along the way.
>
> I believe this is the last remaining TODO on my Cilk Plus pragma
> simd list. Everything else is dependent on OMP4.
>
> Is this what you had in mind?
Roughly, yes
[list copied]
On 06/20/13 11:20, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 05:08:38PM -0500, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 06/19/13 16:43, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 04:39:52PM -0500, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Jumps are disallowed into or out of the body of the for loop
associated
