Thanks! Committed.
On June 12, 2015 3:28:51 AM GMT+02:00, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
>This was missed in the big intN patch set I did last year; it only
>shows up if you have a target with an N-bit type that isn't also used
>for a pointer type but is used for unwinding (which is a change I also
>have pending, hence I notic
This was missed in the big intN patch set I did last year; it only
shows up if you have a target with an N-bit type that isn't also used
for a pointer type but is used for unwinding (which is a change I also
have pending, hence I noticed ;). Tested on x86-64 and msp430 (with
the pending patch) wi
