On Sun, 13 Nov 2011, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Would that be improved by replacing i386 with x86?
>
> libstdc++ omits several features when built for 80386 due to the lack
> of certain atomic operations, so I think it might be useful if the
> manual used x86 to refer to the generic architecture, as
On 13 November 2011 04:28, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> @@ -1269,7 +1269,7 @@
> to display how ad hoc this is: On Solaris, both -pthreads and
> -threads (with subtly different meanings) are honored. On OSF,
> -pthread and -threads (with subtly different meanings) are
> - honored.
This is the third to last patch necessary for libstdc++ from what I
can tell; committed to trunk.
Gerald
2011-11-13 Gerald Pfeifer
* using.xml: Use GNU/Linux.
Index: doc/xml/manual/using.xml
===
--- doc/xml/manual/using
