On 08/20/2018 05:36 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
As a matter of style I don't personally like the pattern in which a
condition has both tests and actions. It's too easy to miss the
action. I would prefer to see this more like the original code:
if (!bad_fn && in != STDIN_FILE_NO)
{
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>
> This is the first of a pair of patches I've had on the modules branch for a
> while. They improve the error behaviour in the case of child failure when
> vfork is the forking mechanism.
>
> This one commonizes the error paths in the pare
This is the first of a pair of patches I've had on the modules branch
for a while. They improve the error behaviour in the case of child
failure when vfork is the forking mechanism.
This one commonizes the error paths in the parent and child to a pair of
single blocks that print or return the
