On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 18:15 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Monday 2014-10-20 15:19, David Malcolm wrote:
> > +@item Sphinx (any working version)
>
> As opposed to "any non-working version"? ;-) I'd just omit
> "working" from this.
FWIW, all my development has been with Sphinx 1.1.3, which is
On Monday 2014-10-20 15:19, David Malcolm wrote:
> +@item Sphinx (any working version)
As opposed to "any non-working version"? ;-) I'd just omit
"working" from this.
Otherwise this looks good to me, except...
> +Necessary to regenerate @file{jit/docs/_build/texinfo} from the .rst
> +files in
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, David Malcolm wrote:
> +Necessary to regenerate @file{jit/docs/_build/texinfo} from the .rst
I'd say @file{.rst}, but otherwise looks OK to me.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
On Fri, 2014-10-17 at 21:25 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> Although Sphinx isn't a build dependency, as a dependency for
> regenerating checked-in files I think it should be documented in
> install.texi (like autoconf, gettext, etc.).
Does this look OK? (Committed to branch dmalcolm/jit for no
