On 05/02/2011 05:19 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
template
struct base
{
void bar(T) { }
};
template
struct derived
: base
{
void
foo(T t)
{ bar(t); }
};
template class derived;
Gosh, c++/24163
Paolo.
On 05/02/2011 04:58 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Why nobody noticed so far? Is there a latent C++ front-end bug? Please
double check (the last time, I took care of filing the corresponding
C++ front-end issue)
-- Jason,
is it known that we accept the below?
Paolo.
//
template
On 05/02/2011 04:52 PM, Ollie Wild wrote:
Submitted to google/main.
Adding libstd...@gcc.gnu.org for trunk approval.
This is Ok for mainline and 4_6-branch.
Why nobody noticed so far? Is there a latent C++ front-end bug? Please
double check (the last time, I took care of filing the correspond
Submitted to google/main.
Adding libstd...@gcc.gnu.org for trunk approval.
Ollie
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Ollie Wild wrote:
>
> commit 99835abc5d2a7fd3ae0950c8a16fd6d223d408c9
> Author: Ollie Wild
> Date: Fri Apr 29 13:03:57 2011 -0400
>
> Remove unqualified lookups into dependent
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:34, Ollie Wild wrote:
> 2011-05-02 Ollie Wild
>
> * include/ext/sso_string_base.h (__sso_string_base<>::_M_construct):
> Fix unqualified lookup.
> (__sso_string_base<>::_M_construct): Likewise.
> (__sso_string_base<>::_M_construct): Likewis
commit 99835abc5d2a7fd3ae0950c8a16fd6d223d408c9
Author: Ollie Wild
Date: Fri Apr 29 13:03:57 2011 -0400
Remove unqualified lookups into dependent template base classes from
STL headers. These break clang.
See http://clang.llvm.org/compatibility.html#dep_lookup_bases.
To b
