On 2013-05-20 09:15 , Evgeniy Stepanov wrote:
Is it OK for google/gcc-4_8 and google/main (or google/integration?) ?
OK for google branches.
Thanks. Diego.
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 20 May 2013 14:15, Evgeniy Stepanov wrote:
>> review please?
>
> I suggest you CC whoever approves changes for the google branches, maybe
> Diego?
rdrand.patch
Description: Binary data
On 20 May 2013 14:15, Evgeniy Stepanov wrote:
> review please?
I suggest you CC whoever approves changes for the google branches, maybe Diego?
review please?
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Evgeniy Stepanov wrote:
> re-sending the patch
>
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Evgeniy Stepanov wrote:
>> friendly ping
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Evgeniy Stepanov wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> this patch disables rdrand in c++11/random
re-sending the patch
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Evgeniy Stepanov wrote:
> friendly ping
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Evgeniy Stepanov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this patch disables rdrand in c++11/random.cc when building with Clang
>> compiler. Current Clang misses a number of definitions
friendly ping
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Evgeniy Stepanov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch disables rdrand in c++11/random.cc when building with Clang
> compiler. Current Clang misses a number of definitions needed to build
> that.
>
> Is it OK for google/gcc-4_8 and google/main (or google/integ
Hi,
this patch disables rdrand in c++11/random.cc when building with Clang
compiler. Current Clang misses a number of definitions needed to build
that.
Is it OK for google/gcc-4_8 and google/main (or google/integration?) ?
rdrand.patch
Description: Binary data
