On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 09:07:02PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> It seems that there is a bug some here:
>
> Here is the reproducer:
>
> #pragma omp declare target
> int a[1];
> #pragma omp end declare target
>
> void foo ()
> {
> #pragma omp target map(to: a[0:1])
> a;
> }
>
>
> lookup_de
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 09:07:02PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> It seems that there is a bug some here:
Thanks, will look at it on Monday.
> Here is the reproducer:
>
> #pragma omp declare target
> int a[1];
> #pragma omp end declare target
>
> void foo ()
> {
> #pragma omp target map(to: a[0:
Hi!
It seems that there is a bug some here:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 19:19:07 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> @@ -12918,6 +12989,28 @@ lower_omp_target (gimple_stmt_iterator *
> var = var2;
> }
>
> + if (offloaded
> + && OMP_CLAUSE_MAP_KIND (c) == GOMP_MAP_FIRSTPRIVAT
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:04:57PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Another version.
> What to do with zero-length array sections vs. objects is still under heated
> debates, so target8.f90 keeps failing intermittently.
Here is a new version of the patch, with various additions (implemented
GOMP_MAP_