On 10/08/2015 05:48 AM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 20:32 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Torvald, can you please have a look at it, if I got all the atomics / memory
models right?
More detailed comments below, but in general, I'd really suggest to add
more code comments for the sy
On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 20:32 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Torvald, can you please have a look at it, if I got all the atomics / memory
> models right?
More detailed comments below, but in general, I'd really suggest to add
more code comments for the synchronization parts. In the end, the level
of
Hi!
This patch implements DOACROSS in the library, so far only as busy waiting
and even without exponential (or some guess based on distance) backoff.
Torvald, can you please have a look at it, if I got all the atomics / memory
models right? The testcase obviously is not a good benchmark, we'll n
