On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 7:39 AM Cherry Zhang wrote:
>
> Finally I found an ARM machine and was able to build ARM32 gcc on it, and
> reproduced the failures. The Go programs aborted, in parse_lsda_header,
> called from probestackmaps in the runtime startup. It seems that
> _Unwind_GetLanguageSpe
Finally I found an ARM machine and was able to build ARM32 gcc on it, and
reproduced the failures. The Go programs aborted, in parse_lsda_header,
called from probestackmaps in the runtime startup. It seems that
_Unwind_GetLanguageSpecificData doesn't return a valid LSDA when called
from a callback
Cherry, see
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2018-12/msg02241.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2018-12/msg02240.html
still shows ~180 test failures on ARM32. Sorry, no access to an ARM32 box until
next year.
Matthias
On 13.12.18 00:27, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12,
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 8:10 AM Cherry Zhang wrote:
>
> Thank you, Matthias!
>
> From the log, essentially all the tests aborted. The only place the new code
> can cause abort on all programs that I can think of is in the runtime startup
> code, probestackmaps, which calls value_size, which abor
Thank you, Matthias!
>From the log, essentially all the tests aborted. The only place the new
code can cause abort on all programs that I can think of is in the runtime
startup code, probestackmaps, which calls value_size, which aborts due to
an unhandled case. I haven't been able to try out on an
On 11.12.18 22:01, Cherry Zhang wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 3:51 PM Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 6:52 AM Matthias Klose wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10.12.18 16:54, Cherry Zhang wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 1:41 AM Matthias Klose
>> wrote:
> On 06.12.18 00:09,
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 3:51 PM Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 6:52 AM Matthias Klose wrote:
> >
> > On 10.12.18 16:54, Cherry Zhang wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 1:41 AM Matthias Klose
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 06.12.18 00:09, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > >>> This libgo
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 6:52 AM Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> On 10.12.18 16:54, Cherry Zhang wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 1:41 AM Matthias Klose wrote:
> >
> >> On 06.12.18 00:09, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> >>> This libgo patch by Cherry Zhang adds support for precise stack
> >>> scanning to th
On 10.12.18 16:54, Cherry Zhang wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 1:41 AM Matthias Klose wrote:
>
>> On 06.12.18 00:09, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>> This libgo patch by Cherry Zhang adds support for precise stack
>>> scanning to the Go runtime. This uses per-function stack maps stored
>>> in the e
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 1:41 AM Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 06.12.18 00:09, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > This libgo patch by Cherry Zhang adds support for precise stack
> > scanning to the Go runtime. This uses per-function stack maps stored
> > in the exception tables in the language-specific dat
Sorry about the breakage. Thanks for the patch.
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:23 AM Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 2:07 AM Rainer Orth
> wrote:
> >
> > > This libgo patch by Cherry Zhang adds support for precise stack
> > > scanning to the Go runtime. This uses per-function stack
11 matches
Mail list logo
