On 06/04/12 17:19, Xinliang David Li wrote:
Another usage is FDO performance tuning trying build with different
options/parameters, so it is common.
This is in our build system for build reproducibility.
If you're trying different options, your builds are not repeatable, so I'm not
totally
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 06/03/12 21:40, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>
>>> Can you explain this more -- what exactly are trying to do? Are you
>>> trying
>>> to rebuild multiple times with the same coverage data,
>>
>>
>> yes -- for instance, in the context of debu
On 06/03/12 21:40, Xinliang David Li wrote:
Can you explain this more -- what exactly are trying to do? Are you trying
to rebuild multiple times with the same coverage data,
yes -- for instance, in the context of debugging a compiler problem,
you will need to compile the same file multiple ti
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 06/03/12 17:16, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>
>> Basically it makes it very difficult to rebuild the file with the
>> profile data --- which makes problem triaging impossible. What is
>
>
> Can you explain this more -- what exactly are tryin
On 06/03/12 17:16, Xinliang David Li wrote:
Basically it makes it very difficult to rebuild the file with the
profile data --- which makes problem triaging impossible. What is
Can you explain this more -- what exactly are trying to do? Are you trying to
rebuild multiple times with the same c
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 06/03/12 05:51, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>>>
>>> I've committed this patch to fix and improve coverage reporting:
>>>
>>> 1) the time stamp local_tick will be -1 if the user ov
On 06/03/12 05:51, Xinliang David Li wrote:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
I've committed this patch to fix and improve coverage reporting:
1) the time stamp local_tick will be -1 if the user overrides the random
seed. In such cases the gcov data file should be deleted
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> I've committed this patch to fix and improve coverage reporting:
>
> 1) the time stamp local_tick will be -1 if the user overrides the random
> seed. In such cases the gcov data file should be deleted, just as it would
> if the time cannot
I've committed this patch to fix and improve coverage reporting:
1) the time stamp local_tick will be -1 if the user overrides the random seed.
In such cases the gcov data file should be deleted, just as it would if the time
cannot be determined.
2) there was a typo in gcov_dump when dumping
