On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 01:35:14PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Jakub, with the release of 4.8.1, is the patch ok for the 4.8 branch
> now?
Ok.
Jakub
Rainer Orth writes:
> Bruce Korb writes:
>
>> On 05/16/13 06:41, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>> Work is going on to incorporate all applicable fixincludes fixes into
>>> the Solaris headers proper. One fix is currently problematic since it
>>> uses an G++-internal macro (__GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__) whe
Bruce Korb writes:
> On 05/16/13 06:41, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> Work is going on to incorporate all applicable fixincludes fixes into
>> the Solaris headers proper. One fix is currently problematic since it
>> uses an G++-internal macro (__GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__) where libstdc++
>> already swit
On 05/16/13 06:41, Rainer Orth wrote:
Work is going on to incorporate all applicable fixincludes fixes into
the Solaris headers proper. One fix is currently problematic since it
uses an G++-internal macro (__GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__) where libstdc++
already switched to testing __cplusplus. The
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Rainer Orth
wrote:
> Work is going on to incorporate all applicable fixincludes fixes into
> the Solaris headers proper. One fix is currently problematic since it
> uses an G++-internal macro (__GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__) where libstdc++
> already switched to test
Work is going on to incorporate all applicable fixincludes fixes into
the Solaris headers proper. One fix is currently problematic since it
uses an G++-internal macro (__GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__) where libstdc++
already switched to testing __cplusplus. The following patch
updates the fix to matc
