On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> Hello gentlemen.
>
> Both of you suggested I revert my removal of deferred_asm_names from
> dwarf2out, since it may cause mangling of DECLs that may ultimately not be
> needed.
>
> A little background...
>
> This all started with a regression
Hello gentlemen.
Both of you suggested I revert my removal of deferred_asm_names from
dwarf2out, since it may cause mangling of DECLs that may ultimately not
be needed.
A little background...
This all started with a regression for pr44197.c in the branch. What is
happening is that the C fr