On Mon, 28 Dec 2020, Eric Gallager wrote:
>> (cf. https://gcc.gnu.org/about.html and I'm happy to help).
> I haven't made a commit to the wwwdocs repo yet, and the last time I
> committed to the main gcc sources repo it was before the transition
> to git, and I did it from a different computer, a
On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 6:55 PM Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020, Eric Gallager wrote:
> > If it's now inactive, maybe also reword the description to change tense
> > from present to past?
> > i.e.:
>
> Yes...
>
> > cilkplus
> > This branch was for the development of the now-obsolete C
On Sun, 27 Dec 2020, Eric Gallager wrote:
> If it's now inactive, maybe also reword the description to change tense
> from present to past?
> i.e.:
Yes...
> cilkplus
> This branch was for the development of the now-obsolete Cilk Plus
> language extension support for the GCC and G++ compilers. Th
On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 1:59 PM Eric Gallager wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 1:50 PM Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>
>> Cilk Plus has been deprecated more than two years ago and not seen
>> development on the GCC side for a while, too.
>>
>> The certificate for www.cilkplus.org expired four weeks ago,
On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 1:50 PM Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Cilk Plus has been deprecated more than two years ago and not seen
> development on the GCC side for a while, too.
>
> The certificate for www.cilkplus.org expired four weeks ago, so
> remove our link there as we move the Cilk Plus entry to
Cilk Plus has been deprecated more than two years ago and not seen
development on the GCC side for a while, too.
The certificate for www.cilkplus.org expired four weeks ago, so
remove our link there as we move the Cilk Plus entry to the section
of Inactive Development branches.
---
htdocs/git.htm
