On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 08:52:34PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
>
> * dump-parse-tree.c (show_omp_clauses): Handle 'filter' clause.
> (show_omp_node, show_code_node): Handle (combined) omp masked construct.
> * frontend-passes.c (gfc_code_walker): Likewise
Hi!
On 2021-08-12T22:48:33+0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> The patch also contains something I should have done much earlier,
... and as its own commit... ;-|
> for clauses that accept some integral expression where we only care
> about the value, forces during gimplification tha
On 13.08.21 16:37, Tobias Burnus wrote:
When converting the C/C++ runtime testcase to Fortran, I did run into
a bug:
https://gcc.gnu.org/PR101899 (see PR or testcase; related to 'omp
taskloop'.)
I am any more sure whether it is a bug or not or what is the bug (see
PR) – however, for this patch
Hi all, hi Jakub,
On 12.08.21 22:48, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
This construct has been introduced as a replacement for master
construct, but unlike that construct is slightly more general,
has an optional clause which allows to choose which thread
will be the one running the region, i
Hi!
This construct has been introduced as a replacement for master
construct, but unlike that construct is slightly more general,
has an optional clause which allows to choose which thread
will be the one running the region, it can be some other thread
than the master (primary) thread with number
