On 20/03/21 09:18 -0500, Tim Song wrote:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 3:58 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Sat, 20 Mar 2021, 01:13 Tim Song via Libstdc++,
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 3:13 PM Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++
wrote:
>
> Implement this C++23 feature, as proposed by P1048R1.
>
> Th
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 3:58 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, 20 Mar 2021, 01:13 Tim Song via Libstdc++,
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 3:13 PM Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Implement this C++23 feature, as proposed by P1048R1.
>> >
>> > This implementation
On Sat, 20 Mar 2021, 01:13 Tim Song via Libstdc++,
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 3:13 PM Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++
> wrote:
> >
> > Implement this C++23 feature, as proposed by P1048R1.
> >
> > This implementation assumes that a C++23 compiler supports concepts
> > already. I don't see an
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 3:13 PM Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++
wrote:
>
> Implement this C++23 feature, as proposed by P1048R1.
>
> This implementation assumes that a C++23 compiler supports concepts
> already. I don't see any point in using preprocessor hacks to detect
> compilers which define __c
Implement this C++23 feature, as proposed by P1048R1.
This implementation assumes that a C++23 compiler supports concepts
already. I don't see any point in using preprocessor hacks to detect
compilers which define __cplusplus to a post-C++20 value but don't
support concepts yet.
libstdc++-v3/Chan
