On 12/31/18 1:29 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
>
> I wonder if it would make sense at this point to rename one of the two
> get_strlen_range functions?
>
> I always found it hard to tell which function is actually meant when they only
> differ in the number of parameters.
Yes, but I don
Hi Jeff,
I wonder if it would make sense at this point to rename one of the two
get_strlen_range functions?
I always found it hard to tell which function is actually meant when they only
differ in the number of parameters.
Regards
Bernd.
This is another chunk of Martin's work that I've extracted. It removes
the "type" and "fuzzy" parameters we pass to get_range_strlen and
replaces them with a strlen_range_kind enum. Mostly this cleans up the
API and avoids the possibility of bogus combinations of "type" and "fuzzy".
It has one e