Re: [committed] RISC-V: Make stack_save_restore tests more robust

2023-10-27 Thread Jeff Law
On 10/27/23 11:34, Patrick O'Neill wrote: On 8/25/23 15:36, Jeff Law wrote: Spurred by Jivan's patch and a desire for cleaner testresults, I went ahead and make the stack_save_restore tests independent of the precise stack size by using a regexp. Pushed to the trunk. Jeff Hi Jeff, A re

Re: [committed] RISC-V: Make stack_save_restore tests more robust

2023-10-27 Thread Patrick O'Neill
On 8/25/23 15:36, Jeff Law wrote: Spurred by Jivan's patch and a desire for cleaner testresults, I went ahead and make the stack_save_restore tests independent of the precise stack size by using a regexp. Pushed to the trunk. Jeff Hi Jeff, A recent change that I'm still bisecting [1] cause

[committed] RISC-V: Make stack_save_restore tests more robust

2023-08-25 Thread Jeff Law
Spurred by Jivan's patch and a desire for cleaner testresults, I went ahead and make the stack_save_restore tests independent of the precise stack size by using a regexp. Pushed to the trunk. Jeffcommit e1f096a3cc96c71907cfbc7b8baf67a3d863cb6d Author: Jeff Law Date: Fri Aug 25 16:34:17 2023