On Feb 21, 2013, at 1:35 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> I've committed the following fix for the following testcase.
> When scalar_op1 is 0x8000 with 64-bit HWI,
> it matches EXACT_POWER_OF_2_OR_ZERO_P, but we should expand it as
> negation of the << 63 shift rather than th
Hi!
I've committed the following fix for the following testcase.
When scalar_op1 is 0x8000 with 64-bit HWI,
it matches EXACT_POWER_OF_2_OR_ZERO_P, but we should expand it as
negation of the << 63 shift rather than the << 63 shift alone.
The patch also improves multipli
