On Apr 20, 2015, at 6:34 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> add_AT_wide is the only add_AT_* that doesn't clear or otherwise initialize
> dw_attr_val.val_entry field, so it contains random garbage, which isn't
> desirable when ggc walks it during collections.
>
> Supposedly this omission originates from
Hi!
add_AT_wide is the only add_AT_* that doesn't clear or otherwise initialize
dw_attr_val.val_entry field, so it contains random garbage, which isn't
desirable when ggc walks it during collections.
Supposedly this omission originates from the val_entry addition being added
everywhere only after
