Re: [c++] Fix pr58525

2013-11-23 Thread Jason Merrill
On 10/07/2013 09:38 AM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote: __cxa_throw_bad_array_new_length and __cxa_throw_bad_array_new_length are generated with -fno-exceptions right now. The attached patch fixes that problem. Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu: Thanks. The underlying code has c

Re: [c++] Fix pr58525

2013-11-14 Thread Alexander Ivchenko
*kind ping* thanks, Alexander 2013/11/8 Alexander Ivchenko : > ups, I did ping in the wrong thread about this issue. Sorry. > > > Anyway, I noticed that after r204334 my patch cannot be applied > without conflicts. > Here is the updated one attached. Bootstrapped and regtested on > x86_64-unknown

Re: [c++] Fix pr58525

2013-11-08 Thread Alexander Ivchenko
ups, I did ping in the wrong thread about this issue. Sorry. Anyway, I noticed that after r204334 my patch cannot be applied without conflicts. Here is the updated one attached. Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. 2013-11-08 Alexander Ivchenko * gcc/cp/call.c (bui

[c++] Fix pr58525

2013-10-07 Thread Alexander Ivchenko
Hi, __cxa_throw_bad_array_new_length and __cxa_throw_bad_array_new_length are generated with -fno-exceptions right now. The attached patch fixes that problem. Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu: 2013-10-07 Alexander Ivchenko * gcc/cp/call.c (build_operator_new_call