Re: [buildrobot] [PATCH] c6x.c: `mark_addressable' not declared

2013-11-13 Thread Andrew MacLeod
On 11/13/2013 06:09 AM, Richard Biener wrote: On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: Hi Andrew! Some fallout for tic6x-uclinux: g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qu

Re: [buildrobot] [PATCH] c6x.c: `mark_addressable' not declared

2013-11-13 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > Hi Andrew! > > Some fallout for tic6x-uclinux: > > g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions > -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual > -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedan

[buildrobot] [PATCH] c6x.c: `mark_addressable' not declared

2013-11-13 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
Hi Andrew! Some fallout for tic6x-uclinux: g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-co