us
> > > Cc: Vladimir Makarov ; ja...@redhat.com;
> > > Richard Earnshaw ; Richard Biener
> > > ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Ramana Radhakrishnan
> > >
> > > Subject: Re: [backport gcc10, gcc9] Requet to backport PR97969
> > >
> > > On
Biener
> > ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Ramana Radhakrishnan
> >
> > Subject: Re: [backport gcc10, gcc9] Requet to backport PR97969
> >
> > On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 00:31, Przemyslaw Wirkus via Gcc-patches > patc...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > To: Przemyslaw Wirkus ; Richard Biener
> > >
> > > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; ja...@redhat.com; ni...@redhat.com;
> > > Richard Earnshaw ; Ramana
> Radhakrishnan
> > > ; Kyrylo Tkachov
> > >
> > > Subject: Re: [backport gcc10, gcc
...@redhat.com; ni...@redhat.com;
> > Richard Earnshaw ; Ramana Radhakrishnan
> > ; Kyrylo Tkachov
> >
> > Subject: Re: [backport gcc10, gcc9] Requet to backport PR97969
> >
> >
> > On 2021-05-25 5:14 a.m., Przemyslaw Wirkus wrote:
> > > Hi,
> &
ect: Re: [backport gcc10, gcc9] Requet to backport PR97969
>
>
> On 2021-05-25 5:14 a.m., Przemyslaw Wirkus wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Just a follow up after GCC 11 release.
> >
> > I've backported to gcc-10 branch (without any change to original patches)
> &
On 2021-05-25 5:14 a.m., Przemyslaw Wirkus wrote:
Hi,
Just a follow up after GCC 11 release.
I've backported to gcc-10 branch (without any change to original patches)
PR97969 and following PR98722 & PR98777 patches.
Commits apply cleanly without changes.
Built and regression tested on:
* arm-
ect: RE: [backport gcc10, gcc9] Requet to backport PR97969
>
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2021, Przemyslaw Wirkus wrote:
>
> > > On 2021-01-18 7:50 a.m., Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, Przemyslaw Wirkus wrote:
> > > >
> > > >&
On Tue, 2 Feb 2021, Przemyslaw Wirkus wrote:
> > On 2021-01-18 7:50 a.m., Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, Przemyslaw Wirkus wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> Can we backport PR97969 patch to GCC 10 and (maybe) GCC 9 ?:
> > >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97
> On 2021-01-18 7:50 a.m., Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, Przemyslaw Wirkus wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Can we backport PR97969 patch to GCC 10 and (maybe) GCC 9 ?:
> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97969
> >>
> >> IMHO bug is severe and could land in GCC 10 an
On 2021-01-18 7:50 a.m., Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, Przemyslaw Wirkus wrote:
Hi all,
Can we backport PR97969 patch to GCC 10 and (maybe) GCC 9 ?:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97969
IMHO bug is severe and could land in GCC 10 and 9. Vladimir's original patch:
On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, Przemyslaw Wirkus wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can we backport PR97969 patch to GCC 10 and (maybe) GCC 9 ?:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97969
>
> IMHO bug is severe and could land in GCC 10 and 9. Vladimir's original patch:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patc
Hi all,
Can we backport PR97969 patch to GCC 10 and (maybe) GCC 9 ?:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97969
IMHO bug is severe and could land in GCC 10 and 9. Vladimir's original patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-January/563322.html
applies without changes to both
12 matches
Mail list logo
