Re: [VRP] Improve value ranges for unsigned division

2015-06-28 Thread Kugan
On 26/06/15 04:27, Jeff Law wrote: > On 06/24/2015 12:36 AM, Kugan wrote: >> >> >> On 23/06/15 01:09, Richard Biener wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Kugan >>> wrote: As discussed in PR64130, this patch improves the VRP value ranges for unsigned division. Bootstrap

Re: [VRP] Improve value ranges for unsigned division

2015-06-25 Thread Jeff Law
On 06/24/2015 12:36 AM, Kugan wrote: On 23/06/15 01:09, Richard Biener wrote: On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Kugan wrote: As discussed in PR64130, this patch improves the VRP value ranges for unsigned division. Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu and regression tested o

Re: [VRP] Improve value ranges for unsigned division

2015-06-23 Thread Kugan
On 23/06/15 01:09, Richard Biener wrote: > On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Kugan > wrote: >> As discussed in PR64130, this patch improves the VRP value ranges for >> unsigned division. >> >> Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu and regression >> tested on arm-none-linux-gnu wi

Re: [VRP] Improve value ranges for unsigned division

2015-06-22 Thread Richard Biener
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Kugan wrote: > As discussed in PR64130, this patch improves the VRP value ranges for > unsigned division. > > Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu and regression > tested on arm-none-linux-gnu with no new regression. > > Is this OK for trunk? Hum

[VRP] Improve value ranges for unsigned division

2015-06-20 Thread Kugan
As discussed in PR64130, this patch improves the VRP value ranges for unsigned division. Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu and regression tested on arm-none-linux-gnu with no new regression. Is this OK for trunk? Thanks, Kugan gcc/ChangeLog: 2015-06-20 Kugan Vivekanandara