> i386 only, might be related
>
> ,.,. CXG2021 ACATS 2.5 13-05-27 17:47:57
> CXG2021 Check the accuracy of the complex SIN and COS functions.
>* CXG2021 Identity_2_Test 3 0: Cos(( 1.60300E+01, 1.6E+01))
> imaginary part actual: 1.40623E+06 expected:
>
> i386 only, might be related
>
> ,.,. CXG2021 ACATS 2.5 13-05-27 17:47:57
> CXG2021 Check the accuracy of the complex SIN and COS functions.
>* CXG2021 Identity_2_Test 3 0: Cos(( 1.60300E+01, 1.6E+01))
> imaginary part actual: 1.40623E+06 expected:
>
Eric Botcazou writes:
>> * The new gnat.dg/fp_exception.adb test fails on Solaris 9 and 10/x86,
>> Solaris 9 and 11/SPARC:
>>
>> +FAIL: gnat.dg/fp_exception.adb execution test
>>
>> raised CONSTRAINT_ERROR : SIGFPE
>
> Patch collision. After
>
> 2013-05-24 Eric Botcazou
>
> * gcc-
> I've included the patch in my Solaris bootstraps this weekend, and
> results don't look good:
>
> * On Solaris 9/x86 and Solaris 10/x86 (both 32- and 64-bit), I get a new
> ACATS failure which may or may not be related:
>
> +FAIL: cxg2021
>
> i386 only, might be related
>
> ,.,. CXG2021
Hi Eric,
> this isn't really valid Ada semantics, but some people enable traps-on-fp-
> exceptions in the FPU on Solaris and expect the Ada exception to be caught.
> There is a glitch with the x87 and the SPARC FPUs: the SIGFPE is delivered
> after the faulting instruction by Solaris, so the unwi
Hi,
this isn't really valid Ada semantics, but some people enable traps-on-fp-
exceptions in the FPU on Solaris and expect the Ada exception to be caught.
There is a glitch with the x87 and the SPARC FPUs: the SIGFPE is delivered
after the faulting instruction by Solaris, so the unwinder is foole
