On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 14:34, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/cond_unary_4.c
> > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/cond_unary_4.c
> > index 4604365fbef..cedc5b7c549 100644
> > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch
Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/cond_unary_4.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/cond_unary_4.c
> index 4604365fbef..cedc5b7c549 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/cond_unary_4.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/c
On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 at 13:26, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 at 20:42, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> >> > On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 21:19, Richard Sandiford
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks for looking at
Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 at 20:42, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>> > On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 21:19, Richard Sandiford
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for looking at this.
>> >>
>> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> > As mentio
On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 at 20:42, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 21:19, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks for looking at this.
> >>
> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> >> > Hi,
> >> > As mentioned in PR, for the following test-case:
> >
Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 21:19, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for looking at this.
>>
>> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>> > Hi,
>> > As mentioned in PR, for the following test-case:
>> >
>> > typedef unsigned char uint8_t;
>> >
>> > static inline uint8_t
>> > x
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 21:19, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Thanks for looking at this.
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > Hi,
> > As mentioned in PR, for the following test-case:
> >
> > typedef unsigned char uint8_t;
> >
> > static inline uint8_t
> > x264_clip_uint8(uint8_t x)
> > {
> > uint8_
Thanks for looking at this.
Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> Hi,
> As mentioned in PR, for the following test-case:
>
> typedef unsigned char uint8_t;
>
> static inline uint8_t
> x264_clip_uint8(uint8_t x)
> {
> uint8_t t = -x;
> uint8_t t1 = x & ~63;
> return (t1 != 0) ? t : x;
> }
>
> void
>
Hi,
As mentioned in PR, for the following test-case:
typedef unsigned char uint8_t;
static inline uint8_t
x264_clip_uint8(uint8_t x)
{
uint8_t t = -x;
uint8_t t1 = x & ~63;
return (t1 != 0) ? t : x;
}
void
mc_weight(uint8_t *restrict dst, uint8_t *restrict src, int n)
{
for (int x = 0; x
