On 01/18/2016 02:38 PM, Roman Zhuykov wrote:
Hello,
4 years ago when I create some SMS patches nobody cares about SMS
failures on ia64. Now ia64 is even more dead but at least one of bugs
appears on powerpc - PR69252.
Proposed patch is here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/txt00266.t
On 01/20/2016 02:30 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
2016-01-20 Martin Sebor
PR target/69252
* gcc.target/powerpc/pr69252.c: New test.
This is OK once the fix for the scheduler goes in. It could be improved
by moving it into gcc.dg since I don't see anything in it that is PPC
specifi
On 01/18/2016 02:38 PM, Roman Zhuykov wrote:
Hello,
4 years ago when I create some SMS patches nobody cares about SMS
failures on ia64. Now ia64 is even more dead but at least one of bugs
appears on powerpc - PR69252.
Proposed patch is here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/txt00266.t
Hello,
4 years ago when I create some SMS patches nobody cares about SMS
failures on ia64. Now ia64 is even more dead but at least one of bugs
appears on powerpc - PR69252.
Proposed patch is here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/txt00266.txt and it even
suits current trunk without modi
This week I investigated modulo scheduler on IA64. Enabling SMS by default
(-fmodulo-sched -fmodulo-sched-allow-regmoves) leads to bootstrap failure
on IA64: gcc/build/genautomata.o differs while comparing stages 2 and 3.
I haven't studied this issue in detail, because the combination of these
my
