Re: [SH] PR 51244 - catch more unnecessary T bit stores

2012-11-02 Thread Kaz Kojima
Oleg Endo wrote: > With this patch a few more cases are handled where the T bit is stored > and then re-tested again before conditional branches. > Tested on rev 193061 with > make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim > \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,-m4a/-ml,-m4a/-mb}" > > an

[SH] PR 51244 - catch more unnecessary T bit stores

2012-11-02 Thread Oleg Endo
Hello, With this patch a few more cases are handled where the T bit is stored and then re-tested again before conditional branches. Tested on rev 193061 with make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,-m4a/-ml,-m4a/-mb}" and no new failures. OK?