On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:41:48AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:18:05AM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:03:55AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > > callers to pass in the RELOAD_REG_VMX class explicitly.
> > > > (rs
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:18:05AM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:03:55AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > callers to pass in the RELOAD_REG_VMX class explicitly.
> > > (rs6000_secondary_reload): Likewise.
> > > (rs6000_preferred_reload_class): Likewise.
> >
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:03:55AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 08:16:36AM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > This match renames the d-form mode support function and makes it more
> > general.
> > It was originally written to test whether we have the ISA 3.0
Hi!
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 08:16:36AM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> This match renames the d-form mode support function and makes it more general.
> It was originally written to test whether we have the ISA 3.0 new D*-form
> instruction, but I believe in the future, I will want to use it also
This match renames the d-form mode support function and makes it more general.
It was originally written to test whether we have the ISA 3.0 new D*-form
instruction, but I believe in the future, I will want to use it also for GPR
and tradiational floating point registers.
I have built bootstrap co
