On 6/27/24 3:56 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
This is really more of a question than a patch.
Looking at PR/115687 I managed to convince myself there's a general
class of problems here: splitting might produce constant subexpressions,
but as far as I can tell there's nothing to eliminate those co
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Palmer Dabbelt
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2024 10:57 PM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt
> Subject: [RFC PATCH] cse: Add another CSE pass after split1
>
> This is really more of a question than a patch.
>
Hi,
On Thu, 2024-06-27 at 14:56 -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> This is really more of a question than a patch.
>
> Looking at PR/115687 I managed to convince myself there's a general
> class of problems here: splitting might produce constant subexpressions,
> but as far as I can tell there's noth
This is really more of a question than a patch.
Looking at PR/115687 I managed to convince myself there's a general
class of problems here: splitting might produce constant subexpressions,
but as far as I can tell there's nothing to eliminate those constant
subexpressions. So I very quickly threw
