> On Oct 7, 2024, at 20:37, Kito Cheng wrote:
>
> I suggest not handling the extension implication rules. This way, it
> can simplify
> the logic and reduce the cost of run-time checks.
>
> Also, you need to consider situations where that extension can't be detected.
For this, I would also l
I suggest not handling the extension implication rules. This way, it
can simplify
the logic and reduce the cost of run-time checks.
Also, you need to consider situations where that extension can't be detected.
And last, I would like to defer this until run-time resolver patch coming, but
welcome
This patch implements the riscv_minimal_hwprobe_feature_bits feature
for the RISC-V target. The feature bits are defined in the previous
patch [1] to provide bitmasks of ISA extensions that defined in RISC-V
C-API. Thus, we need a function to generate the feature bits for IFUNC
resolver to dispatch
