On Jul 25, 2018, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 04:11:11PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Jul 24, 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
>>
>> > This patch adds fake uses of user variables at the point where they go out
>> > of
>> > scope, to keep user variables inspectable throughout
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 04:11:11PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jul 24, 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
>
> > This patch adds fake uses of user variables at the point where they go out
> > of
> > scope, to keep user variables inspectable throughout the application.
>
> I suggest also adding suc
On Jul 24, 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
> This patch adds fake uses of user variables at the point where they go out of
> scope, to keep user variables inspectable throughout the application.
I suggest also adding such uses before sets, so that variables aren't
regarded as dead and get optimized ou
On 07/24/2018 01:46 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 01:37:32PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> Another drawback is that the fake uses confuse the unitialized warning
>> analysis, so that is switched off for -fkeep-vars-live.
>
> Is that really needed? I.e. can't you for the purpo
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 01:37:32PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Another drawback is that the fake uses confuse the unitialized warning
> analysis, so that is switched off for -fkeep-vars-live.
Is that really needed? I.e. can't you for the purpose of uninitialized
warning analysis ignore the clobb
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 01:30:30PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 07/16/2018 05:10 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > On 07/16/2018 03:50 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
> >>> Any comments?
> >>
> >> Interesting idea. I wonder if that should be generalized
> >> to
