Hi,
Segher Boessenkool writes:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 01:25:19PM +0800, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>> This patch tries to put the constant into constant pool if building the
>> constant requires 3 or more instructions.
>>
>> But there is a concern: I'm wondering if this patch is really profi
Jiufu Guo writes:
> Hi,
>
> Richard Biener writes:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 7:26 AM Jiufu Guo via Gcc-patches
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This patch tries to put the constant into constant pool if building the
>>> constant requires 3 or more instructions.
>>>
>>> But there is a concern: I
Hi,
Richard Biener writes:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 7:26 AM Jiufu Guo via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch tries to put the constant into constant pool if building the
>> constant requires 3 or more instructions.
>>
>> But there is a concern: I'm wondering if this patch is rea
Hi!
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 01:25:19PM +0800, Jiufu Guo wrote:
> This patch tries to put the constant into constant pool if building the
> constant requires 3 or more instructions.
>
> But there is a concern: I'm wondering if this patch is really profitable.
>
> Because, as I tested, 1. for simp
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 7:26 AM Jiufu Guo via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch tries to put the constant into constant pool if building the
> constant requires 3 or more instructions.
>
> But there is a concern: I'm wondering if this patch is really profitable.
>
> Because, as I tested, 1
Hi,
This patch tries to put the constant into constant pool if building the
constant requires 3 or more instructions.
But there is a concern: I'm wondering if this patch is really profitable.
Because, as I tested, 1. for simple case, if instructions are not been run
in parallel, loading constant
