On Thu, 10 Nov 2022, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 11/10/22 08:29, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Nov 2022, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> >> For this I would suggest using the tag to neatly fold links
> >> for old releases. Please see the attached patch.
> >
> > Loving it, Alexander!
> >
> > Wha
On 11/10/22 08:29, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Wed, 9 Nov 2022, Alexander Monakov wrote:
For this I would suggest using the tag to neatly fold links
for old releases. Please see the attached patch.
Loving it, Alexander!
What do you guys think about unfolding all releases we, the GCC project,
cu
On Wed, 9 Nov 2022, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> For this I would suggest using the tag to neatly fold links
> for old releases. Please see the attached patch.
Loving it, Alexander!
What do you guys think about unfolding all releases we, the GCC project,
currently support (per https://gcc.gnu.org
On 11/9/22 20:32, Alexander Monakov wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Nov 2022, Martin Liška wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I think we should remove documentation for unsupported GCC releases
>> as it's indexed by Google engine.
>
> I'd agree with previous responses that outright removing the links is
> undesirable,
On Wed, 9 Nov 2022, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I think we should remove documentation for unsupported GCC releases
> as it's indexed by Google engine.
I'd agree with previous responses that outright removing the links is
undesirable, and pointing Google to recent documentation should be done
On Wed, 9 Nov 2022, Michael Matz via Gcc-patches wrote:
> I think everything that's on the web server (even the 2.95 docu) has to be
> reachable via a (reasonable) set of clicks from the main index.html. It
> doesn't need to be _directly_ from the main index.html, though.
>
> Also, you simply
Hello,
On Wed, 9 Nov 2022, Martin Liška wrote:
> I think we should remove documentation for unsupported GCC releases
> as it's indexed by Google engine. Second reason is that the page is long
> one one can't easily jump to Current development documentation.
>
> Thoughts?
I think everything that
On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 02:54:48PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> I think we should remove documentation for unsupported GCC releases
> as it's indexed by Google engine. Second reason is that the page is long
> one one can't easily jump to Current development documentation.
>
> Thoughts?
I'd prefer
Hi.
I think we should remove documentation for unsupported GCC releases
as it's indexed by Google engine. Second reason is that the page is long
one one can't easily jump to Current development documentation.
Thoughts?
Martin
---
htdocs/onlinedocs/index.html | 1294 -
