I have added a wiki page to help with transitioning old VEC code to the new API.
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cxx-conversion/cxx-vec
I am doing the final tests (only a handful of testsuite failures to
fix) and expect to commit the patch in the coming days.
I've included in this message everyone who s
On 2012-10-17 06:14 , Richard Biener wrote:
Can't we implement vec_e as vec by
means of a partial specialization?
Ah, yes, that's certainly possible and prevents renaming the types in
the future.
I have not yet implemented the "fast" vectors from my proposal.
Those would be useful for free
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
> I have overhauled the interface to VEC over the last few
> weeks. I implemented most of the plan I outlined in
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-08/msg00268.html.
>
> I have implemented the embedded and space-efficient vectors. The
> diff for vec.[ch]
I have overhauled the interface to VEC over the last few
weeks. I implemented most of the plan I outlined in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-08/msg00268.html.
I have implemented the embedded and space-efficient vectors. The
diff for vec.[ch] is sufficiently confusing that I'm just
attaching both
