On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
wrote:
>> Please provide updated ChangeLog.
>
> --- gcc/ChangeLog (revision 206106)
> +++ gcc/ChangeLog (working copy)
> @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
> +2013-12-19 Ganesh Gopalasubramanian
> +
> + * config/i386/i386.c: Include cf
> Please provide updated ChangeLog.
--- gcc/ChangeLog (revision 206106)
+++ gcc/ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+2013-12-19 Ganesh Gopalasubramanian
+
+ * config/i386/i386.c: Include cfgloop.h.
+ (ix86_loop_memcount): New function.
+ (ix86_loop_unroll_ad
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
wrote:
> Accommodated the changes that you mentioned.
> Completed the bootstrap testing too.
Please provide updated ChangeLog.
The function comment is missing. Maybe you should also describe magic
number 32 here?
+static unsigned
+ix86
Guenther
(richard.guent...@gmail.com)
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH, i386] Adjust unroll factor for bdver3 and bdver4
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
wrote:
> Attached is the revised patch.
> The target independent part has been already approved and added.
>
> This
t: Re: [RFC] [PATCH, i386] Adjust unroll factor for bdver3 and bdver4
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
wrote:
> Attached is the revised patch.
> The target independent part has been already approved and added.
>
> This revision of the patch adds a x86 tune definit
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
wrote:
> Attached is the revised patch.
> The target independent part has been already approved and added.
>
> This revision of the patch adds a x86 tune definition and checks it while
> deciding the unroll factor.
>
> Accommodated the co
ard Guenther
(richard.guent...@gmail.com); borntrae...@de.ibm.com; H.J. Lu
(hjl.to...@gmail.com); Jakub Jelinek (ja...@redhat.com)
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH, i386] Adjust unroll factor for bdver3 and bdver4
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
wrote:
> Steamroller proc
r 22, 2013 1:46 PM
> To: Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Richard Guenther
> (richard.guent...@gmail.com); borntrae...@de.ibm.com; H.J. Lu
> (hjl.to...@gmail.com); Jakub Jelinek (ja...@redhat.com)
> Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH, i386] Adjust unroll factor for bdver3 and b
atches@gcc.gnu.org; Richard Guenther
(richard.guent...@gmail.com); borntrae...@de.ibm.com; H.J. Lu
(hjl.to...@gmail.com); Jakub Jelinek (ja...@redhat.com)
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH, i386] Adjust unroll factor for bdver3 and bdver4
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
wrote:
> Steamroller processors contain a loop predictor and a loop buffer, which may
> make unrolling small loops less important.
> When unrolling small loops for steamroller, making the unrolled loop fit in
> the loop buffer should be
redhat.com)
Subject: RE: [RFC] [PATCH, i386] Adjust unroll factor for bdver3 and bdver4
> I suggest you add this to x86-tune.def and enable it for
> bdver3 and bdver4.
The macro TARGET_LOOP_UNROLL_ADJUST is not new. It is already available and is
used by target s390.
Since it is not an "x86 o
dhat.com)
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH, i386] Adjust unroll factor for bdver3 and bdver4
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Steamroller processors contain a loop predictor and a loop buffer, which may
> make unrolling small loops less important.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Steamroller processors contain a loop predictor and a loop buffer, which may
> make unrolling small loops less important.
> When unrolling small loops for steamroller, making the unrolled loop fit in
> the loop buffer s
Hi,
Steamroller processors contain a loop predictor and a loop buffer, which may
make unrolling small loops less important.
When unrolling small loops for steamroller, making the unrolled loop fit in the
loop buffer should be a priority.
This patch uses a heuristic approach (number of memory re
14 matches
Mail list logo