On 01/02/2012 01:19 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 01:13 +0100, Torvald Riegel wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 15:17 -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 12/19/2011 02:58 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
In the particular case (the validated loads technique used in
method-gl.cc, load(), s
On 12/20/2011 11:13 AM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 15:17 -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 12/19/2011 02:58 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
>>> In the particular case (the validated loads technique used in
>>> method-gl.cc, load(), store(), and validate()), we actually do not need
On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 01:13 +0100, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 15:17 -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > On 12/19/2011 02:58 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> > > In the particular case (the validated loads technique used in
> > > method-gl.cc, load(), store(), and validate()), we actua
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 15:17 -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 12/19/2011 02:58 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> > In the particular case (the validated loads technique used in
> > method-gl.cc, load(), store(), and validate()), we actually do not need
> > to have loads or stores to be really atomic,
On 12/19/2011 02:58 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> In the particular case (the validated loads technique used in
> method-gl.cc, load(), store(), and validate()), we actually do not need
> to have loads or stores to be really atomic, but need the compiler to
> treat them as if they were atomics wrt. t
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 11:17 -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 11/30/2011 05:13 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > The library is written in C++, so in theory we can use the real atomic<>
> > templates, etc. Except that we have the same horrid problem finding the
> > C++ headers as did for , so
On 12/13/2011 11:43 AM, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
>> I've committed the patch.
>
> It caused:
>
> ../../../work/libitm/config/posix/rwlock.cc: In member function 'bool
> GTM::gtm_rwlock::write_lock_generic(GTM::gtm_thread*)':
> ../../../work/libitm/config/posix/rwlock.cc:196:56: error: comparis
> I've committed the patch.
It caused:
../../../work/libitm/config/posix/rwlock.cc: In member function 'bool
GTM::gtm_rwlock::write_lock_generic(GTM::gtm_thread*)':
../../../work/libitm/config/posix/rwlock.cc:196:56: error: comparison between
signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Werror=sig
On 11/30/2011 05:13 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> The library is written in C++, so in theory we can use the real atomic<>
> templates, etc. Except that we have the same horrid problem finding the C++
> headers as did for , so again we have a local copy of .
> Blah. But given that it is a co
