On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Marcus Shawcroft
wrote:
> On 14 November 2014 10:50, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:42:27AM +, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:35 AM, James Greenhalgh
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > We currently do not set an
On 14 November 2014 10:50, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:42:27AM +, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:35 AM, James Greenhalgh
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > We currently do not set any interesting default values for jump and
>> > function
>> > alignm
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:42:27AM +, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:35 AM, James Greenhalgh
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We currently do not set any interesting default values for jump and function
> > alignment in AArch64. I've made the formula for these values derive from
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:35 AM, James Greenhalgh
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We currently do not set any interesting default values for jump and function
> alignment in AArch64. I've made the formula for these values derive from
> the issue rate of the processor as so:
>
> jumps: 4 * processor issue-rat
Hi,
We currently do not set any interesting default values for jump and function
alignment in AArch64. I've made the formula for these values derive from
the issue rate of the processor as so:
jumps: 4 * processor issue-rate (rounded down to nearest power of two)
functions: 4 * processor iss
