On 05/17/12 10:59, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Are you still working on this for GCC 4.8?
Not actively.
r~
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Seeing as how Uros is starting to go down the path of cleaning up the
> flags handling for x86, I thought I'd go ahead and knock up the idea
> that I've been tossing around to help automate the process of building
> patterns that match bo
On 02/22/12 17:16, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>> What I know is missing off the top of my head are:
>
>> (2) Can't be usefully used with define_insn_and_split, and no way to tell.
>> This problem should simply be documented in the .texi file as user
>> error.
>
> Not sure I see the problem
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Seeing as how Uros is starting to go down the path of cleaning up the
> flags handling for x86, I thought I'd go ahead and knock up the idea
> that I've been tossing around to help automate the process of building
> patterns that match both clobbering
On 02/14/2012 12:52 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
Other than that: To convert a port, there is still a lot of work to be
done to define and handle the various CC modes properly (well, not for
the pdp11, because it writes out >1 insn for most define_insns), but
it is great not having to define all th
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Seeing as how Uros is starting to go down the path of cleaning up the
> flags handling for x86, I thought I'd go ahead and knock up the idea
> that I've been tossing around to help automate the process of building
> patterns that match bo
Seeing as how Uros is starting to go down the path of cleaning up the
flags handling for x86, I thought I'd go ahead and knock up the idea
that I've been tossing around to help automate the process of building
patterns that match both clobbering the flags and setting the flags to
a comparison.
Thi
