Re: [RFA][fortran] Fix # handling in the Fortran front-end

2018-05-04 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 02:05:11PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 05/04/2018 01:55 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 01:32:00PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > >> > >> The Fortran front end has its own code to parse # > >> directives. We've run into a case where it does not function corre

Re: [RFA][fortran] Fix # handling in the Fortran front-end

2018-05-04 Thread Jeff Law
On 05/04/2018 01:55 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 01:32:00PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: >> >> The Fortran front end has its own code to parse # >> directives. We've run into a case where it does not function correctly. >> In particular when the directive changes the current file,

Re: [RFA][fortran] Fix # handling in the Fortran front-end

2018-05-04 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 01:32:00PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > The Fortran front end has its own code to parse # > directives. We've run into a case where it does not function correctly. > In particular when the directive changes the current file, subsequent > diagnostics still refer to the ori

[RFA][fortran] Fix # handling in the Fortran front-end

2018-05-04 Thread Jeff Law
The Fortran front end has its own code to parse # directives. We've run into a case where it does not function correctly. In particular when the directive changes the current file, subsequent diagnostics still refer to the original filename. Concretely take this code and compile it with -Wall