On Dec 22, 2015, at 3:24 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists)
wrote:
>
>> In theory what I want to be able to do is build all the listed targets
>> and run a single test on them so that we can build these skip/xfail
>> lists much easier.
>>
>> I've done it a few times by hand and it seems like it's som
On 12/22/2015 04:24 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
The bigger problem here is that branch costs are a property of a
specific CPU, not the target architecture. So deciding whether or not
we should skip this test (and perhaps others like it) is impossible
given that we can't know what the d
On 21/12/15 19:38, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 12/18/2015 02:55 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>> --2.2.0.1.gd394abb.dirty
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> PR68232 is a te
On 12/18/2015 02:55 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--2.2.0.1.gd394abb.dirty
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi,
PR68232 is a testsuite failure for targets with very low branch costs.
As
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--2.2.0.1.gd394abb.dirty
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi,
PR68232 is a testsuite failure for targets with very low branch costs.
As the test is looking for if-conversion, it will fai
