Re: [Patch Testsuite] XFAIL gfortran.dg/pr45636.f90 on AArch64

2015-02-12 Thread James Greenhalgh
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:15:42AM +, Marcus Shawcroft wrote: > On 10 February 2015 at 16:06, James Greenhalgh > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > As is already done for mips and hppa, we should XFAIL this test on > > AArch64 as we don't currently use the store_by_pieces infrastructure. > > > > We m

Re: [Patch Testsuite] XFAIL gfortran.dg/pr45636.f90 on AArch64

2015-02-11 Thread Marcus Shawcroft
On 10 February 2015 at 16:06, James Greenhalgh wrote: > > Hi, > > As is already done for mips and hppa, we should XFAIL this test on > AArch64 as we don't currently use the store_by_pieces infrastructure. > > We may in future want to tweak this, but for GCC 5.0 the safe thing > to do is just to XF

Re: [Patch Testsuite] XFAIL gfortran.dg/pr45636.f90 on AArch64

2015-02-10 Thread Mike Stump
On Feb 10, 2015, at 8:06 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote: > As is already done for mips and hppa, we should XFAIL this test on > AArch64 as we don't currently use the store_by_pieces infrastructure. For this patch, either this is obvious or a target person should weigh in. I’d only step in if the ta

[Patch Testsuite] XFAIL gfortran.dg/pr45636.f90 on AArch64

2015-02-10 Thread James Greenhalgh
Hi, As is already done for mips and hppa, we should XFAIL this test on AArch64 as we don't currently use the store_by_pieces infrastructure. We may in future want to tweak this, but for GCC 5.0 the safe thing to do is just to XFAIL the test. Tested with aarch64-none-elf. OK? Thanks, James --