On 20 January 2014 17:33, Alex Velenko wrote:
> Can someone, please, commit this patch, as I do not have permissions?
> Kind regards,
> Alex
Committed.
/Marcus
On 20/01/14 11:16, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 20/01/14 11:15, Alex Velenko wrote:
On 17/01/14 15:55, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 16/01/14 14:43, Alex Velenko wrote:
On 14/01/14 15:51, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 14, 2014, at 7:19 AM, Alex Velenko wrote:
Hi,
This patch turns off the v
On 20/01/14 11:15, Alex Velenko wrote:
> On 17/01/14 15:55, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> On 16/01/14 14:43, Alex Velenko wrote:
>>> On 14/01/14 15:51, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2014, at 7:19 AM, Alex Velenko wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch turns off the vec_pe
On 17/01/14 15:55, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 16/01/14 14:43, Alex Velenko wrote:
On 14/01/14 15:51, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 14, 2014, at 7:19 AM, Alex Velenko wrote:
Hi,
This patch turns off the vec_perm patterns for aarch64_be, this should resolve
the issue highlighted here
ht
On 16/01/14 14:43, Alex Velenko wrote:
> On 14/01/14 15:51, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 14, 2014, at 7:19 AM, Alex Velenko wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This patch turns off the vec_perm patterns for aarch64_be, this should
>>> resolve
>>> the issue highlighted here
>>> http://gcc.gn
On 14/01/14 15:51, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 14, 2014, at 7:19 AM, Alex Velenko wrote:
Hi,
This patch turns off the vec_perm patterns for aarch64_be, this should resolve
the issue highlighted here
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00321.html
With this patch applied, the t
> On Jan 14, 2014, at 7:19 AM, Alex Velenko wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch turns off the vec_perm patterns for aarch64_be, this should resolve
> the issue highlighted here
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00321.html
> With this patch applied, the test case provided in that link
Hi,
This patch turns off the vec_perm patterns for aarch64_be, this should
resolve
the issue highlighted here
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00321.html
With this patch applied, the test case provided in that link compiles
without an ICE.
However, the Big-Endian port is still i
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 12:10:13AM +, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Marcus Shawcroft
> wrote:
> >
> > Andrew, We know that there are numerous issues with aarch64 BE advsimd
> > support in GCC. The aarch64_be support is very much a work in progress.
> > Tejas sorted
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Marcus Shawcroft
wrote:
>
> On 7 Jan 2014, at 23:10, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:31 AM, James Greenhalgh
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This patch adds support for Vector Shuffle style operations
>>> through support for TARGET_VECTORIZE_VEC_P
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:31 AM, James Greenhalgh
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch adds support for Vector Shuffle style operations
> through support for TARGET_VECTORIZE_VEC_PERM_CONST_OK and
> the vec_perm and vec_perm_const standard patterns.
>
> In this patch we add the framework and support for t
> OK
>
> /Marcus
Thanks Marcus,
I've committed this and the follow-up patch to trunk and
back-ported them to AArch64-4.7-branch.
The back-port required back-porting the attached patch,
which fixes up the expected behaviour of
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-8.c.
After committing this as a p
OK
/Marcus
On 4 December 2012 10:31, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch adds support for Vector Shuffle style operations
> through support for TARGET_VECTORIZE_VEC_PERM_CONST_OK and
> the vec_perm and vec_perm_const standard patterns.
>
> In this patch we add the framework and suppor
Hi,
This patch adds support for Vector Shuffle style operations
through support for TARGET_VECTORIZE_VEC_PERM_CONST_OK and
the vec_perm and vec_perm_const standard patterns.
In this patch we add the framework and support for the
generic tbl instruction. This can be used to handle any
vector perm
14 matches
Mail list logo
